DSL MEMO SERIES
2002-06
June 12, 2002
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Department of Health and Family Services
Division of Supportive Living
To:
Area Administrators/Assistant Area Administrators
Community Support Program Directors/Coordinators
Consumer Organizations
County Departments of Community Program Directors
County Departments of Human Services Directors
Mental Health Coordinators
Tribal Chairpersons/Human Services Facilitators
Mental Health Council
Blue Ribbon Commission Implementation Advisory Committee
Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy
Wisconsin Counties Human Service Association
Wisconsin NAMI and Local Affiliates
From:
Sinikka McCabe, Administrator
Re: CSP Discharge Criteria
The purpose of this memo is to clarify the current discharge criteria
for Community Support Programs (CSP). It is the position of the Bureau of
Community Mental Health to support individual recovery and client choice.
It is also the Bureau’s position to assure continuity of care and access
to treatment and support services appropriate to the needs and wishes of
consumers. The Bureau is in the process of identifying ways that the
mental health system can enhance these outcomes. First, it is important
that there is information available to our partners on what the current
statutes and regulations require. This information memorandum outlines the
current requirements for the Community Support Program client discharge
criteria. Secondly, the Community Support Program standards will be
revised and during that process the discharge criteria will be
re-evaluated.
Community Support Programs were developed to provide a range of
coordinated and comprehensive treatment, rehabilitation and support
services via a specified program with highly trained staff. The design of
the program is to provide services to individuals meeting the admission
criteria as long as services are necessary and desired. Individuals
admitted to Community Support Programs have serious and persistent mental
illnesses that significantly impact their lives and present barriers to
personal accomplishments in the areas of work, social relationships, and
independent living. These individuals typically need more than is provided
in case management or outpatient treatment services. Due to the severity
and persistence of these illnesses, Community Support Programs were
intended to provide individuals with continuity of care and long term
access to treatment services.
HSS 63.10(2)(b)5. requires that criteria for termination of treatment,
rehabilitation and support services be described on the individualized
treatment plan. Optimally these criteria should be individualized and specific
to the individual consumer. There has been some confusion around these
criteria and programs have referred to specific criteria required by state
surveyors and consultants. There is no such state criterion. The
Community Support Programs establish the discharge criteria. A number of
CSPs have adopted the same discharge criteria for all consumers in the
program. Other CSPs have moved toward individual criteria developed in
partnership and collaboration with individual consumers.
There are a number of reasons that discharge from a CSP would occur.
Each program determines the possible reasons for discharge in their
discharge policy. Some situations that have resulted in discharge are:
CSPs are required to have policies that define the discharge process
and procedures to be followed in the above circumstances and define the
transition and aftercare planning. HSS 63.12(2) and (3) require
coordination of treatment and referrals. The CSP has responsibility for
coordination of treatment while an individual is part of the CSP. The
program also has the responsibility for coordination of linkages and
referrals to ensure follow-up of consumers referred to other treatment and
service providers. In the case of discharge, this is accomplished through
direct communication with providers who will provide services after
discharge from the CSP. This coordination helps smooth the transition from
one provider to another and assures continuity of care. Planning must
include attention to clinical treatment needs as well as practical needs
that have been addressed during the course of CSP involvement (housing,
parenting, health care, employment and activities of daily living). The
comprehensiveness of this transition planning offers assurance that
consumers do not experience lapses in services or untoward outcomes as a
result of discharge from a CSP.
It is required that a discharge summary be written within one week
after termination of treatment or services.
Discharges do occur from CSPs. The 2000 CSP Monitoring Report indicates
that 322 individuals were discharged from certified CSPs. The breakdown of
the total is that 73 individuals met the discharge criteria, 97
individuals moved out of the county, 64 deaths occurred, 25 individuals
were discharged due to medical reasons and nursing home placement, 10
individuals were incarcerated, 30 individuals refused CSP or selected
other services, and 23 were discharged for other reasons specified in
program policies.
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT: Area Administrator
|
CENTRAL OFFICE CONTACT: |
Pat Rutkowski
Clinical Consultant
Bureau of Community Mental Health
(608) 266-9331 |
Jenny Lowenberg
Clinical Consultant
Bureau of Community Mental Health
(608) 267-7923 |
cc:
BQA Certification Staff
Sue Schroeder
Joyce Allen
Return to Info Memos Index
|